Beta: SMath Studio 0.99.6962 (23 January 2019)

Beta: SMath Studio 0.99.6962 (23 January 2019) - Messages

#1 Posted: 1/22/2019 6:39:35 PM
Andrey Ivashov

Andrey Ivashov

2270 likes in 3734 posts.

Group: Super Administrator

Application can be easily extended based on your needs. Built-in Extensions Manager tool allows to get access to hundreds official and third-party resources of the following types: usage examples, plug-ins, SMath Viewer based applications, snippets, interface translations, interactive books, handbooks and tutorials.

It provides numerous computing features and rich user interface translated into about 40 different languages. Application also contains integrated mathematical reference book.

Changes introduced in current build 0.99.6962

Miscellaneous

  • Dynamic Assistance updated to support high DPI;
  • Support for different Header/Footer for specific Worksheet page fixed;
  • Invalidation errors fixed on regions/cursor moving;
  • Refactoring.

Download

SMathStudioDesktop.0_99_6962.Mono.tar.gz (1 MiB) downloaded 655 time(s).

SMathStudioDesktop.0_99_6962.Setup.msi (2 MiB) downloaded 1825 time(s).



Please note:
  1. There are some known bugs with Worksheet scrolling - will be addressed soon;
  2. There are some UI issues on environment with high DPI (some Custom plug-ins may not be scaled correctly).
    Please use the following to disable high dpi support if required:
    not_dpi_aware.PNG


To all developers:

As you may notice starting from build 0.99.6955 SMath Studio supports high DPI and in order to scale Regions correctly we have to introduce new requirement:
- Plug-in must use SMath.Drawing.Graphics instead of System.Drawing.Graphics everywhere.
or
- All Fonts created by the plug-in must have GraphicsUnit.Pixel specified as a unit and size must be multiplied by 96f / 72f in order to convert Points to Pixels.

All existing plug-ins should be updated according to this requirement as everything looks ok while system is configured to have use 96 DPI, but in all other cases scaling of Fonts in plug-ins is incorrect.

All modern platforms like iOS, Android, UWP have Pixel specified as a unit by default, so this issue appears on Windows machines only (we have it on Linux as well because of Mono).

Please let me know in case of any related questions. If you are not able to perform changes by yourself - just let me know and I will update plug-ins by myself.

Best regards, Andrey Ivashov.
5 users liked this post
frapuano 1/22/2019 7:55:00 PM, NDTM Amarasekera 1/23/2019 12:05:00 AM, sergio 1/23/2019 8:48:00 AM, Radovan Omorjan 1/23/2019 3:41:00 PM, Oscar Campo 1/23/2019 5:30:00 PM
#2 Posted: 1/24/2019 5:35:53 PM
overlord

overlord

554 likes in 1333 posts.

Group: Moderator

I have always thought those ones looks weird, especially when they are printed.

- Pi
- Euler's number
- Booelan Equal
- Infinity

weird.png

It's up to developer to "correct" them anyway. But it is just frustrating to change them in PDF manually )

Regards

#3 Posted: 1/24/2019 7:06:26 PM
Andrey Ivashov

Andrey Ivashov

2270 likes in 3734 posts.

Group: Super Administrator

Wrote

I have always thought those ones looks weird, especially when they are printed.

- Pi
- Euler's number
- Booelan Equal
- Infinity

weird.png



Hello.

What you do not like exactly? Font? Style (bold)? Both?

Best regards.
#4 Posted: 1/25/2019 2:17:30 AM
overlord

overlord

554 likes in 1333 posts.

Group: Moderator

for infinity, the size.
for pi/euler/boelan equal, the thickness. they should not to be bold actually.
#5 Posted: 1/31/2019 3:29:03 AM
overlord

overlord

554 likes in 1333 posts.

Group: Moderator

Wrote



Hello.

What you do not like exactly? Font? Style (bold)? Both?

Best regards.



By taking into consideration of the silence, should I not wait for change for them?

Regards
#6 Posted: 1/31/2019 4:39:17 AM
Martin Kraska

Martin Kraska

1222 likes in 2150 posts.

Group: Moderator

As for pi and e, you can easily get rid of the bold face.
Actually, it would be sufficient to just give pre-defined values an upright face.

In the equations below, the rhs pi and e should be bold, shouldn't they?

I like the idea of the boolean equal being visually different from the evaluation operator

2019-01-31 08_33_59-SMath Studio 0.99.6965 - [Klausur 2018-2.sm_].png
Martin Kraska Pre-configured portable distribution of SMath Studio: https://en.smath.info/wiki/SMath%20with%20Plugins.ashx
  • New Posts New Posts
  • No New Posts No New Posts