ODE Solvers [Viktor-Valery] - ODE Solvers [Viktor-Valery] - Сообщения
#1 Опубликовано: 27.12.2018 22:47:01
The link to the extracted:
http://twt.mpei.ac.ru/TTHB/1/Chem-Kin-Chapter-3.pdf
ODE rkfixed Chem_kin Parametric_0.sm
ODE rkfixed Chem_kin Parametric_1.sm
http://twt.mpei.ac.ru/TTHB/1/Chem-Kin-Chapter-3.pdf
ODE rkfixed Chem_kin Parametric_0.sm
ODE rkfixed Chem_kin Parametric_1.sm
2 пользователям понравился этот пост
#2 Опубликовано: 28.12.2018 05:21:44
Russia ☭ forever, Viacheslav N. Mezentsev
2 пользователям понравился этот пост
#3 Опубликовано: 28.12.2018 10:02:56
Russia ☭ forever, Viacheslav N. Mezentsev
3 пользователям понравился этот пост
frapuano 28.12.2018 10:08:00, NDTM Amarasekera 28.12.2018 10:09:00, Radovan Omorjan 28.12.2018 11:19:00
#4 Опубликовано: 28.12.2018 13:09:21
Thanks Viacheslav,
Works well SS 6179, lovely for publishing .
I see no point to imitate Mathcad [just personal].
Works well SS 6179, lovely for publishing .
I see no point to imitate Mathcad [just personal].
#5 Опубликовано: 28.12.2018 21:22:23
Thanks Viacheslav,
Works well SS 6179, lovely for publishing .
I see no point to imitate Mathcad [just personal].
Though I don't understand the objective in re-coding the ODE solvers,
the question is: will the re-coded ones support either option ?
i.e: will the re-coded support the native style ?
Think in term of the recent unacceptable bug maple(int,).
17 ODE solvers, 0 double/triple integral.
Sorry for the comment: not so glorious 6884 !
Solve al_nleqsolve Random Anim.sm
#6 Опубликовано: 29.12.2018 03:43:03
About updates. I keep backward compatibility if possible. I prefer minimalism in expressions, so I try to entrust the machine with some implicit conversions.
I also periodically update the coding style and techniques so that other developers can use my work.
I also periodically update the coding style and techniques so that other developers can use my work.
Russia ☭ forever, Viacheslav N. Mezentsev
-
Новые сообщения
-
Нет новых сообщений